HTML5時代のJavaScriptとハッシュオブジェクトの苦悩 - C++ ときどき ごはん、わりとてぃーぶれいく☆
先ず、ベンチマーク結果とソースコードを示そう。 結果 LH-MAIN /tmp% node --version v0.6.13 LH-MAIN /tmp% node hash_depth.js { time: 1045, title: 'direct' } { time: 1155, title: 'array depth-1' } { time: 1503, title: 'array depth-2' } { time: 1636, title: 'array depth-3' } { time: 1905, title: 'array depth-4' } { time: 2106, title: 'array depth-5' } ソース usagi's gist: 2318809 — Gist var v = 'Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consec
Snap: A Haskell Web Framework: Blog: Snap 0.3 Benchmarks with GHC 7.0.1
The relative performance of the frameworks stays pretty much the same, except that Happstack is good at serving files, while Node.js is slower. We didn’t try to figure out what rate would optimize Happstack’s throughput on the file benchmark, but it seems reasonable to assume that it won’t make as big of a difference here as it did with pong. After we published the last results comments here and h
1
リリース、障害情報などのサービスのお知らせ
最新の人気エントリーの配信
処理を実行中です
j次のブックマーク
k前のブックマーク
lあとで読む
eコメント一覧を開く
oページを開く
